Good
morning good people of St. Paul’s, Coffeyville (KS). [personal introduction]
We’ve
just come through major seasons (Advent, Christmas, Epiphany, and Easter) in
which we’ve focused on the divine Word made flesh. And, we’ve just
celebrated the birth of the church with the coming of the Holy Spirit (Pentecost).
After today’s celebration of God as Trinity, we’ll begin a long stretch of our
church year, considered ‘ordinary time’, in which the liturgical color returns
to green and we’ll be focusing on creation, growth, and discipleship, which
includes focusing on how we nurture relationship with God and each other.
A representation of the Christian Trinity, by Spanish artist Jerónimo Cosida, from Cistercian Monastery of Tulebras, Navarra, Spain, c. 1570 |
Many
preachers this morning will be quick to point out that this Trinity Sunday is
the only principle feast based on a doctrinal dogma of our church rather than
the celebration of an event in the life of Jesus. And, we could spend at least all of today
delving deeply in discussion of the Trinity – there’s much to explore
here. And, it’s also common wisdom among
theologians that if you talk about the Trinity more than just a few minutes,
you’re bound to slip into any number of heresies that have gotten people into
all kinds of trouble.
In the
triune spirit, let’s say that we’ll touch on three things briefly this morning:
1)
some
context for our Trinitarian belief and practice, 2) reflection on what our
assigned lectionary readings invite us to consider, and 3) what all this might
mean to us personally regarding our relationship to God and to each other.
First,
some context regarding the Trinity and Trinity Sunday.
Let’s
not take contemporary contentions about the Holy Trinity for granted as a
merely academic debate. Since the time
of Jesus on the earth, many believers have struggled rigorously, and at points
in history to the point of their own martyrdom, to make sense of and profess a
coherent belief about the nature of God, Christ, and the Spirit. How shall we reconcile a fundamentally
monotheistic belief (inherited from later Judaism) with beliefs about the divinity
of Jesus and/or the Spirit? How do we
order the ‘persons’ of the Trinity? Was Jesus begotten or made? Is Christ one being with God? Does the Spirit
proceed from God or from God’s offspring? What does any of this matter to our
fundamental relationship as mortals to the ineffable creator of everything? We’ve been debating biblical evidence (e.g.,
baptismal formula in Matt 28:19 or greeting/blessing in 2 Cor 13:13) and
formulations about the triune nature of God for ages. While the stakes of this debate today might
be simply academic or social acceptance within denominational identity, let’s
be clear that people in the past sometimes staked their very lives on the truth
of a triune understanding of God. At the heart of Trinitarian debates, perhaps
not so ironically, are the issues of identity, belonging, and
relationship.
The earliest known depiction of the Trinity, Dogmatic Sarcophagus, 350 AD |
Although
Trinitarian language emerged in earlier centuries, it wasn’t until the early 4th
Century (325) that a specific Trinitarian doctrine was proclaimed as orthodoxy
coming out of the Council of Nicaea – this particular formulation becoming the
foundation of the creeds that we recite today at baptisms and during regular
worship and therefore influencing how many of us perceive and understand the
nature of God as coming to us manifested as Jesus Christ (forever reconnecting
the creator with creation) and remaining with us through the Holy Spirit. There remain today, however, divisions
between ‘Eastern’ and ‘Western’ Christian thinking about the ordering of the
part of the Trinity and therefore the particular wording of the creeds. And, there are some Christian traditions that
have dropped the Trinity from their common language as an outdated, erroneous, idolatrous
distraction. Again, it’s ironic that
talk of the Trinity stirs up potential contention and division among what we
hope is a unified family in common relationship under God.
As
Episcopalians, we’ve inherited the tradition of Trinity Sunday from our Roman
Catholic roots. In earlier times, there
both post-Pentecost as well pre-Advent dates set aside for special observance
of the Trinity to celebrate the source of all creation and relationship.
Eventually, in the early 14th Century
(1334), Pope John XXII declared the Sunday after Pentecost as the feast day for
observance of the Trinity by the Western/Latin church, a practice that remains
normative for Anglicans and for us.
Of
course, the traditional Trinitarian doxology (glory-saying) language of Father,
Son, and Holy Spirit is familiar to many of us from our worship services (E.g.,
the Gloria Patri / “Glory to the Father…”
as well as the 17th Century hymn lines “Praise God from whom all
blessings flow…”). And, as communities of
faith have sought to use more inclusive language, you also might have heard of “parent,
child, and familial love”; “creator, redeemer, and sustainer”; “Creator,
Christ, and Spirit one”; “source, wellspring, and living water”, or “love, the
beloved, and mutual love”. In all cases, these formulations are symbolic of an
active relationship between the three ‘persons’ or aspects of God with which we
have experience in Scripture, history, and our own experience – God as source of creation, provider of
sustenance, order, and provision, and desiring of our redemption and
preservation.
If the
concept of a single God being three-in-one is still perplexing you, you might ‘get
it’ through metaphor or analogy. God is
like a divine chord that is heard through the harmonious dance of several distinct
notes. God is like the ‘fire triangle’ we’ve learned about in science class – for
the creative force to exist there needs to be an interplay between heat
(intention), fuel (incarnate substance), and oxygen (breath). Or, if you imagine the different roles that you
play in the lives of others and how they perceive you differently in each
relationships (you are simultaneously parent, child, lover, friend), you might
get a sense of how God can be three in one…. and how, again, at the heart the language
we use to describe God is about relationship.
Next,
let’s consider some of what the Spirit it saying to us through this morning’s
lectionary readings.
Our
lessons today, while not explicitly highlighting Trinity, call us to consider
the nature of God fundamentally relational, intimately interested in relationship
us and our relationship with each other.
We need to hear what is being said not just intellectually with our
minds, but also emotionally through our heart and gut.
In the
reading from Isaiah (6:1-8), we are awakened to the sheer awesomeness of God,
our own feelings of unworthiness and shame, and God’s initiative to cleanse us
and transform us and to send us into out to our neighbors with good news.
The Psalmist describes an awesome God who gives
us strength and blessings of peace to share with each other.
In his letter to the Romans, Paul both warns
us that if we live only focused on our flesh (selfish, earthly desires) we are
destined for slavery, fear, and death while also assuring us that if we are
moved by the Spirit into relationship with Christ that we are, by God, adopted again
as God’s own children and reunited with the family of God (not through our own actions,
but by the grace of our heavenly parent).
E.g., “all who are led by the Spirit are children of God” (v 14); “you
have received a spirit of adoption.... Abba!” (v 15) [note: abba is Aramaic
form of ‘daddy’ / how a child would address male parent at home / intimacy and
trust]; “it is that very Spirit bearing witness with our spirit that we are
children of God” (v 16); and we are “heirs of God and joint heirs with Christ”
(v 17).
And in John (3:1-17), we’re shown that it’s
possible to be ‘saved’ and born anew if we embrace life in Christ (looking up
to the one who has come down from heaven, just as early followers with Moses
were saved from earthly venomous death when they looked up the bronze serpent
that God told Moses to raise before them – Num 21:4-9) and we’re assured that
we’re in good company even when our curiosity about Christ begins even under the
cover of darkness, away from the potential persecution of others who don’t
believe. Nicodemus, a legally minded
member of the ruling religious council, is invited to consider the words of the
living Word in new ways and we’re told later that he defends Jesus before the
Sanhedrin (John 7:50-51) and is honors Jesus by brining spices for his burial (John
19:38-40). The lesson concludes with the
comforting statement that God so loved creation that God came to us– sent us
his Son (his loving Word incarnate) – to redeem and save us; to reunite us to
God’s family.
Now,
what does all this mean to you and me?
[question
1 for congregational response] What hope do you find in the Trinity?
From our lessons today and from even a brief re-consideration of the history of our quest for meaning through the Trinitarian doctrine I am called again to the truth that God speaks to each of us in ways that we can understand – using both literal and figurative language – in order to draw us back into relationship with God and with each other.
God is
our creator, our divine parent and yearns for us to be family through redemption
and adoption.
God is
united to us through manifestation of real physical presence – becoming like us
in shape and form in order to ensure that we’re connected to God.
God is with
us each and every day through the realization of self-sacrificing, charitable
love shared between us.
Even if we begin under the cover of darkness, out of the sight of others initially, Christ
honors our curiosity and speaks to us in language rich with meaning for the
mind and the soul.
We are
therefore invited to come forward out of shadows, perhaps initially with some
shame and/or awe, and to be restored (through fire that burns away what separates
us and water that cleanses us) to our rightful place in the light as daughters
and sons of God, heirs with Christ of an eternal, holy relationship with God.